|
Authors
Ridewaan Hanslo, Maureen TannerAbstract
Context: Despite the popularity of Agile software development, achieving consistent project success remains challenging. Furthermore, identifying what contributes to project success is inconsistent across studies. In addition measuring success is incoherent, and existing SLR's are not systematic, explicit, and comprehensive making it hard to replicate investigations.
Objective: This systematic literature review (SLR) identifies critical success factors (CSFs) in Agile projects to improve outcomes.
Method: We analyzed 53 primary studies published between 2001 and 2024, employing thematic synthesis with content analysis to uncover recurring themes and patterns.
Results: Our analysis yielded 21 CSFs categorized into five themes: organizational, people, technical, process, and project. These factors range from management dedication and organizational environment to team effectiveness, emotional mindset, and Agile practices. Team effectiveness and project management emerged as the most frequently cited CSFs, highlighting the importance of people and process factors to Agile project outcomes.
Conclusions: These interpreted and integrated themes and factors contributed to developing a theoretical framework to identify how these factors contribute to project success. This study offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners, guiding future research to validate these findings and develop targeted interventions to enhance Agile project success.
Keywords
agile, project success, software development, systematic literature review, content analysis, thematic synthesis, theoretical framework, critical success factorsReferences
1. A. Ahimbisibwe, R.Y. Cavana, and U. Daellenbach, “A contingency fit model of critical success factors for software development projects: A comparison of agile and traditional plan-based methodologies,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management , Vol. 28, No. 1, 2015, pp. 7–33.
2. B. Binboga and C.A. Gumussoy, “Factors affecting agile software project success,” IEEE Access , Vol. 12, 2024, pp. 95 613–95 633.
3. A. Ahimbisibwe, U. Daellenbach, and R.Y. Cavana, “Empirical comparison of traditional plan-based and agile methodologies: Critical success factors for outsourced software development projects from vendors’ perspective,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management , Vol. 30, No. 3, 2017, pp. 400–453.
4. R. Hanslo and M. Tanner, “Machine learning models to predict Agile methodology adoption,” in 15th Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 697–704.
5. A.V. Chekmarev, “Agile with relation to conflicts theory,” in Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference of Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies IT and QM and IS . IEEE, 2019, pp. 23–26.
6. A. Gemino, B.H. Reich, and P.M. Serrador, “Agile, traditional, and hybrid approaches to project success: is hybrid a poor second choice?” Project management journal , Vol. 52, No. 2, 2021, pp. 161–175.
7. T. Chow and D.B. Cao, “A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects,” Journal of Systems and Software , Vol. 81, No. 6, 2008, pp. 961–971.
8. D. Stankovic, V. Nikolic, M. Djordjevic, and D.B. Cao, “A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects in former Yugoslavia IT companies,” Journal of Systems and Software , Vol. 86, No. 6, 2013, pp. 1663–1678.
9. J.F. Rockart, “Chief executives define their own data needs,” Harvard business review , Vol. 57, No. 2, 1979, pp. 81–93.
10. A. Elzamly and B. Hussin, “An enhancement of framework software risk management methodology for successful software development,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology , Vol. 62, No. 2, 2014, pp. 410–423.
11. C. Tam, E.J. da Moura, T. Oliveira, and J. Varajão, “The factors influencing the success of on-going agile software development projects,” International Journal of Project Management , Vol. 38, No. 3, 2020, pp. 165–176.
12. C. Tam, E.J.D.C. Moura, T. Oliveira, and J. Varajão, “The factors influencing the success of on-going agile software development projects,” International Journal of Project Management , Vol. 38, No. 3, 2020, pp. 165–176.
13. D. Russo, “The agile success model: a mixed-methods study of a large-scale agile transformation,” ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) , Vol. 30, No. 4, 2021, pp. 1–46.
14. V. Garousi, A. Tarhan, D. Pfahl, A. Coşkunçay, and O. Demirörs, “Correlation of critical success factors with success of software projects: an empirical investigation,” Software Quality Journal , Vol. 27, No. 1, 2019, pp. 429–493.
15. P. Serrador and R. Turner, “The relationship between project success and project efficiency,” Project management journal , Vol. 46, No. 1, 2015, pp. 30–39.
16. Standish Group, Chaos 2020: beyond infinity . Standish Group, 2020.
17. M.S. Castro, B. Bahli, A. Barcaui, and R. Figueiredo, “Does one project success measure fit all? An empirical investigation of Brazilian projects,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business , Vol. 14, No. 3, 2021, pp. 788–805.
18. E. Kandengwa and L.T. Khoza, “Measuring agile software project success beyond the triple constraint,” South African Journal of Information Management , Vol. 23, No. 1, 2021, pp. 1–8.
19. I. Lishner and A. Shtub, “Measuring the success of lean and agile projects: Are cost, time, scope and quality equally important?” Journal of Modern Project Management , Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 138–145.
20. A.A. Cucolaş and D. Russo, “The impact of working from home on the success of scrum projects: A multi-method study,” Journal of Systems and Software , Vol. 197, 2023, pp. 1–22.
21. L. Barros, C. Tam, and J. Varajao, “Agile software development projects–Unveiling the human-related critical success factors,” Information and Software Technology , Vol. 170, No. 107432, 2024, pp. 1–12.
22. A. Fink, Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper . Sage publications, 2019.
23. S. Keele, “Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering,” EBSE, Tech. Rep. ver. 2.3, 2007.
24. F. Rowe, “What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations,” European Journal of Information Systems , Vol. 23, No. 3, 2014, pp. 241–255.
25. J. Vom Brocke, A. Simons, K. Riemer, B. Niehaves, R. Plattfaut et al., “Standing on the shoulders of giants: Challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems , Vol. 37, No. 1, 2015, p. 9.
26. R. Hanslo and M. Tanner, “A framework of critical success factors for agile software development,” in The 41st ACM/SIGAPP Symposium On Applied Computing . ACM, 2026.
27. D. Kulathunga and S. Ratiyala, “Key success factors of Scrum software development methodology in Sri Lanka,” American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS) , Vol. 45, No. 1, 2018, pp. 234–252.
28. T.T. Luong, U. Sivarajah, and V. Weerakkody, “Do Agile Managed Information Systems Projects Fail Due to a Lack of Emotional Intelligence?” Information Systems Frontiers , Vol. 23, No. 2, 2021, pp. 415–433.
29. P. Serrador and J.K. Pinto, “Does Agile work? — A quantitative analysis of agile project success,” International Journal of Project Management , Vol. 33, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1040–1051.
30. J. Sithambaram, M.H.N.B.M. Nasir, and R. Ahmad, “Issues and challenges impacting the successful management of agile-hybrid projects: A grounded theory approach,” International Journal of Project Management , 2021.
31. D. Truong and T. Jitbaipoon, “How Can Agile Methodologies Be Used to Enhance the Success of Information Technology Projects?” International Journal of Information Technology Project Management , Vol. 7, No. 2, 2016, pp. 1–16.
32. D.S. Nguyen, “Success factors that influence agile software development project success,” American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS) , Vol. 17, No. 1, 2016, pp. 171–222.
33. K. Petersen and C. Wohlin, “A comparison of issues and advantages in agile and incremental development between state of the art and an industrial case,” Journal of Systems and Software , Vol. 82, No. 9, 2009, pp. 1479–1490.
34. S. Misra, V. Kumar, U. Kumar, K. Fantazy, and M. Akhter, “Agile software development practices: evolution, principles, and criticisms,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management , Vol. 29, No. 9, 2012, pp. 972–980.
35. A.L. Asnawi, Investigating adoption of and success factors for agile software development in Malaysia , Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southampton, Faculty of Physical and Applied Sciences, 2012.
36. N. Dwivedi, D. Katiyar, and G. Goel, “A comparative study of various software development life cycle (SDLC) models,” International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management , Vol. 5, No. 3, 2022, pp. 141–144.
37. J. Yu, “Research process on software development model,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering , Vol. 394, No. 3, 2018, p. 032045.
38. M. Stoica, M. Mircea, and B. Ghilic-Micu, “Software development: agile vs. traditional,” Informatica Economica , Vol. 17, No. 4, 2013.
39. K. Jugdev and R. Müller, “A retrospective look at our evolving understanding of project success,” Project Management Journal , Vol. 36, No. 4, 2005, pp. 19–31.
40. J.R. Turner and R. Müller, “On the nature of the project as a temporary organization,” International Journal of Project Management , Vol. 21, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1–8.
41. A. Cockburn and J. Highsmith, “Agile software development: The people factor,” Computer , Vol. 34, No. 11, 2001, pp. 131–133.
42. Y.B. Leau, W.K. Loo, W.Y. Tham, and S.F. Tan, “Software development life cycle AGILE vs traditional approaches,” in International Conference on Information and Network Technology (ICINT 2012) , Vol. 37, 2012, pp. 162–167.
43. B. Boehm, “Get ready for agile methods, with care,” Computer , Vol. 35, No. 1, 2002, pp. 64–69.
44. M. Gaborov, D. Karuović, M. Kavalic, D. Radosav, D. Milosavljev et al., “Comparative analysis of agile and traditional methodologies in IT project management,” Journal of Applied Technical and Educational Sciences , Vol. 11, No. 4, 2021, pp. 1–24.
45. K. Beck et al., “The agile manifesto,” 2001.
46. S. Al-Saqqa, S. Sawalha, and H. Abdelnabi, “Agile software development: Methodologies and trends,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies , Vol. 14, No. 11, 2020, pp. 246–270.
47. G. Arcos-Medina and D. Mauricio, “Identifying factors influencing on agile practices for software development,” Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences , Vol. 44, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1–31.
48. T. Dybå and T. Dingsøyr, “Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review,” Information and Software Technology , Vol. 50, No. 9, 2008, pp. 833–859.
49. T. Kamal, Q. Zhang, M.A. Akbar, M. Shafiq, A. Gumaei et al., “Identification and prioritization of agile requirements change management success factors in the domain of global software development,” IEEE Access , Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 44 714–44 726.
50. M. Kuhrmann, P. Tell, R. Hebig, J. Klünder, J. Münch et al., “What makes agile software development agile?” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. 48, No. 9, 2021, pp. 3523–3539.
51. G. Thomas and W. Fernández, “Success in IT projects: A matter of definition?” International Journal of Project Management , Vol. 26, No. 7, 2008, pp. 733–742.
52. J. Varajão, J.L. Pereira, A. Trigo, and I.C.A. Moura, “Information systems project management success,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management , Vol. 9, No. 4, 2021, pp. 62–74.
53. J. Varajão and A. Trigo, “Assessing IT project success: Perception vs. reality,” ACM Queue , Vol. 22, No. 4, 2024, pp. 34–53.
54. K.D. Bakker, A. Boonstra, and H. Wortmann, “Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence,” International Journal of Project Management , Vol. 28, No. 5, 2010, pp. 493–503.
55. L.A. Ika and J.K. Pinto, “The ‘re-meaning’ of project success: Updating and recalibrating for a modern project management,” International Journal of Project Management , Vol. 40, No. 7, 2022, pp. 835–848.
56. J. Pereira, J. Varajão, and N. Takagi, “Evaluation of information systems project success–Insights from practitioners,” Information Systems Management , Vol. 39, No. 2, 2022, pp. 138–155.
57. R. Michalski and S. Zaleski, “Success factors in management of IT service projects: Regression, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation models,” Information , Vol. 15, No. 2, 2024, p. 105.
58. K. Schwalbe, Introduction to project management . Boston: Course Technology, Cengage Learning, 2009.
59. M. Awais, J. Prior, S. Ferguson, and J. Leaney, “Enterprise IT governance and its impact on agile software development project success,” 2018.
60. G.A. Brown, An examination of critical success factors of an agile project , Ph.D. dissertation, Capella Univ., 2015.
61. T.B. Chiyangwa and E. Mnkandla, “Agile methodology perceived success and its use: The moderating effect of perceived compatibility,” South African Computer Journal , Vol. 30, No. 2, 2018, pp. 1–16.
62. J.T. Farlik, Project success in agile development software projects , Ph.D. dissertation, Capella Univ., 2016.
63. A. Hassan, S. Younas, and A. Bhaumik, “Exploring an agile plus approach for project scope, time, and cost management,” International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM) , Vol. 11, No. 2, 2020, pp. 72–89.
64. A. Jarzębowicz and W. Ślesiński, “What is troubling IT analysts? A survey report from Poland on requirements-related problems,” in KKIO 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 830 . Springer, 2019, pp. 3–19.
65. T.T. Meurs, J. Gevers, and P. Le Blanc, “Determining the success factors of Scrum projects,” Master’s thesis, Univ. of Technology, Netherlands, 2015.
66. M. Moloto, A. Harmse, and T. Zuva, “Impact of agile methodology use on project success in South African banking sector,” in International Conference on Communication, Computing and Electronics Systems: Proceedings of ICCCES 2020 . Springer Singapore, 2021, pp. 157–173.
67. H. Taherdoost and A. Keshavarzsaleh, “A theoretical review on IT project success/failure factors and evaluating the associated risks,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Telecommunications and Informatics (TELE-INFO’15) . Sliema, Malta: WSEAS Press, 2015.
68. L. Stanberry, Critical Success Factors for Large and Distributed Agile Software Development Projects Using Scrum in US-Based Global Companies , Ph.D. dissertation, Capella Univ., 2018.
69. J. Recker, R. Holten, M. Hummel, and C. Rosenkranz, “How agile practices impact customer responsiveness and development success: A field study,” Project Management Journal , Vol. 48, No. 2, 2017, pp. 99–121.
70. A. Salman, M. Jaafar, S. Malik, D. Mohammad, and S.A. Muhammad, “An empirical investigation of the impact of the communication and employee motivation on the project success using agile framework and its effect on the software development business,” Business Perspectives and Research , Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021, pp. 46–61.
71. M. Tanner and U. von Willingh, “Factors leading to the success and failure of agile projects implemented in traditionally waterfall environments,” in Human capital without borders: Knowledge and learning for the quality of life . Portorož, Slovenia: Make Learn, 2014, pp. 693–701.
72. B.G. Tavares, C.E.S. da Silva, and A.D. de Souza, “Practices to improve risk management in agile projects,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering , Vol. 29, No. 03, 2019, pp. 381–399.
73. Z. Baghizadeh, D. Cecez-Kecmanovic, and D. Schlagwein, “Review and critique of the information systems development project failure literature: An argument for exploring information systems development project distress,” Journal of Information Technology , Vol. 35, No. 2, 2020, pp. 123–142.
74. D. Avison and G. Fitzgerald, Information systems development: methodologies, techniques and tools . McGraw Hill, 2003.
75. E. Meenakshi, A. Singh, and D. Agrawal, “A review on success factors of agile software development,” International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering , Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020, pp. 33–36.
76. H. Krasner, “The cost of poor software quality in the US: A 2020 report,” The Consortium for Information & Software Quality (CISQ), Tech. Rep., 2021.
77. M. Jørgensen and K. Moløkken-Østvold, “How large are software cost overruns? A review of the 1994 CHAOS report,” Information and Software Technology , Vol. 48, No. 4, 2006, pp. 297–301.
78. Y. Hu, X. Zhang, X. Sun, M. Liu, and J. Du, “An intelligent model for software project risk prediction,” in 2009 International conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering (ICIII) , 2009.
79. C. Iriarte and S. Bayona, “IT projects success factors: a literature review,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management , Vol. 8, No. 2, 2020, pp. 49–78.
80. C. Bilir and E. Yafez, “Project success/failure rates in Turkey,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management , Vol. 9, No. 4, 2021, pp. 24–40.
81. A. Srivastava, D. Mehrotra, P. Kapur, and A.G. Aggarwal, “Analytical evaluation of agile success factors influencing quality in software industry,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management , Vol. 11, 2020, pp. 247–257.
82. B. Kitchenham, “Procedures for performing systematic reviews,” Keele, UK, Keele Univ. , Vol. 33, 2004, pp. 1–26.
83. G. Paré, M.C. Trudel, M. Jaana, and S. Kitsiou, “Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews,” Information and Management , Vol. 52, No. 2, 2015, pp. 183–199.
84. J.F. Wolfswinkel, E. Furtmueller, and C.P. Wilderom, “Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature,” European journal of information systems , Vol. 22, No. 1, 2013, pp. 45–55.
85. G. Schryen, “Writing qualitative IS literature reviews – Guidelines for synthesis, interpretation and guidance of research,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems , Vol. 37, No. 12, 2015, pp. 286–325.
86. G. Oosterwyk, I. Brown, and S. Geeling, “A synthesis of literature review guidelines from information systems journals,” in Proceedings of 4th International Conference on the Internet, Cyber Security and Information Systems (ICICIS) , Vol. 12, 2019, pp. 250–260.
87. Y. Xiao and M. Watson, “Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review,” Journal of planning education and research , Vol. 39, No. 1, 2019, pp. 93–112.
88. W.M. Bramer, D. Giustini, J. Kleijnen, and O.H. Franco, “Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study,” Systematic Reviews , Vol. 7, 2018, pp. 1–8.
89. S. Kraus, M. Breier, and S. Dasí-Rodríguez, “The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal , Vol. 16, 2020, pp. 1023–1042.
90. D.V. Cicchetti, “Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology,” Psychological assessment , Vol. 6, No. 4, 1994, p. 284.
91. J.L. Fleiss, “Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters,” Psychological bulletin , Vol. 76, No. 5, 1971, p. 378.
92. M.L. McHugh, “Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic,” Biochemia medica , Vol. 22, No. 3, 2012, pp. 276–282.
93. A. Liberati et al., “The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration,” Annals of internal medicine , Vol. 151, No. 4, 2009, pp. 65–94.
94. K.A. Neuendorf, “Content analysis and thematic analysis,” in Advanced research methods for applied psychology , 2018, pp. 211–223.
95. M. Vaismoradi, H. Turunen, and T. Bondas, “Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study,” Nursing and health sciences , Vol. 15, No. 3, 2013, pp. 398–405.
96. M. Bearman and P. Dawson, “Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education,” Medical education , Vol. 47, No. 3, 2013, pp. 252–260.
97. S. Elo and H. Kyngäs, “The qualitative content analysis process,” Journal of advanced nursing , Vol. 62, No. 1, 2008, pp. 107–115.
98. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Thematic analysis,” in APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological . American Psychological Association, 2012, pp. 57–71.
99. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative research in psychology , Vol. 3, No. 2, 2006, pp. 77–101.
100. T.B. Chiyangwa and E. Mnkandla, “Modelling the critical success factors of agile software development projects in South Africa,” South African Journal of Information Management , Vol. 19, No. 1, 2017.
101. D. Kunda, M. Mulenga, M. Sinyinda, and V. Chama, “Challenges of Agile development and implementation in a developing country: A Zambia case study,” Journal of Computer Science , Vol. 14, No. 5, 2018, pp. 585–600.
102. G.C. Moore and I. Benbasat, “Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation,” Information Systems Research , Vol. 2, No. 3, 1991, pp. 192–222.
103. H. Edison, X. Wang, and K. Conboy, “Comparing methods for large-scale agile software development: A systematic literature review,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. 48, No. 8, 2021, pp. 2709–2731.
104. A. Aldahmash, A.M. Gravell, and Y. Howard, “Using factor analysis to study the critical success factors of agile software development,” Journal of Software , Vol. 12, No. 12, 2017, pp. 957–963.
105. A. Muhammad, A. Siddique, Q.N. Naveed, U. Saleem, M.A. Hasan et al., “Investigating crucial factors of agile software development through composite approach,” Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing , Vol. 27, No. 1, 2021, pp. 15–34.
106. E. van Kelle, “Social factors of agile development success,” Master’s thesis, Tilburg Univ., Tilburg, Netherlands, 2014.
107. D.B. Cao, An empirical investigation of critical success factors in agile software development projects , Ph.D. dissertation, Capella Univ., 2006.
108. M.C. Nguyen, P.W.C. Prasad, A. Alsadoon, L.S. Hoe, and A. Elchouemi, “Cloud-based learning: A study on rapid learning content development with an Agile method,” in IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 974–979.
109. R. Hanslo and E. Mnkandla, “Scrum adoption challenges detection model: SACDM,” in Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 949–957.
110. F. Sultan and L. Chan, “The adoption of new technology: the case of object-oriented computing in software companies,” IEEE transactions on Engineering Management , Vol. 47, No. 1, 2000, pp. 106–126.
111. F.K.Y. Chan and J.Y.L. Thong, “Acceptance of agile methodologies: A critical review and conceptual framework,” Decision Support Systems , Vol. 46, No. 4, 2009, pp. 803–814.
112. R.C. Darnell, Implicit and explicit measures of coordination effectiveness as predictors of agile software development project success: A regression approach , Ph.D. dissertation, Capella Univ., 2015.
113. P. Salovey and J.D. Mayer, “Emotional intelligence,” Imagination, cognition and personality , Vol. 9, No. 3, 1990, pp. 185–211.
114. J.L. Burnette and E.J. Finkel, “Buffering against weight gain following dieting setbacks: An implicit theory intervention,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , Vol. 48, No. 3, 2012, pp. 721–725.
115. C.S. Dweck, Mindset: The new psychology of success . Random house, 2006.
116. D.S. Yeager and C.S. Dweck, “Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed,” Educational psychologist , Vol. 47, No. 4, 2012, pp. 302–314.
117. B.L. Fredrickson and M.F. Losada, “Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing,” American psychologist , Vol. 60, No. 7, 2005, p. 678.
118. X. Xu, R. Chen, L. Jiang, and H. Shi, “Emotional or utilitarian? Exploring the malleability in time perceptions,” Current Psychology , Vol. 42, No. 34, 2023, pp. 29 735–29 744.
119. B.L. Fredrickson, “The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions,” American psychologist , Vol. 56, No. 3, 2001, p. 218.
120. J.J. Gross, “Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects,” Psychological inquiry , Vol. 26, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–26.
121. M.M. Tugade and B.L. Fredrickson, “Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences,” Journal of personality and social psychology , Vol. 86, No. 2, 2004, p. 320.
122. P. Gregory et al., “Agile challenges in practice: A thematic analysis,” in Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming: 16th International Conference , Helsinki, Finland, May 2015, pp. 64–80.
123. E. Salas, R. Rico, and J. Passmore, “The psychology of teamwork and collaborative processes,” in The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes , 2017, pp. 1–11.
124. J.R. Hackman and N. Vidmar, “Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions,” Sociometry , 1970, pp. 37–54.
125. M.A. Campion, G.J. Medsker, and A.C. Higgs, “Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups,” Personnel psychology , Vol. 46, No. 4, 1993, pp. 823–847.
126. A.C. Costa and N. Anderson, “Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , Vol. 20, No. 1, 2011, pp. 119–154.
127. A.K. Nisyak, K. Rizkiyah, and T. Raharjo, “Human related challenges in agile software development of government outsourcing project,” in 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Sciences and Informatics (EECSI) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 222–229.
128. P. Gregory, L. Barroca, H. Sharp, A. Deshpande, and K. Taylor, “The challenges that challenge: Engaging with agile practitioners’ concerns,” Information and Software Technology , Vol. 77, 2016, pp. 92–104.
129. C. Despres and D. Chauvel, “Knowledge management (s),” Journal of knowledge Management , 1999.
130. M. Alavi and D.E. Leidner, “Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues,” MIS quarterly , 2001, pp. 107–136.
131. K.A. Litchmore, A comparative study of agile methods, people factors, and process factors in relation to project success , Ph.D. dissertation, Capella Univ., 2016.
132. S. Mishra, Quality assurance in higher education: An introduction . India: National Assessment and Accreditation Council, 2007.
133. A. Gwangwadza and R. Hanslo, “Towards the success of DevOps environments in software organizations: A conceptual model approach,” in International Development Informatics Association Conference . Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022, pp. 70–88.
134. J. Kramer and J. Magee, “The evolving philosophers problem: Dynamic change management,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. 16, No. 11, 1990, pp. 1293–1306.
135. J. Jesson, Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques . Sage, 2011.
136. A. Abdelaziz, N.R. Darwish, and H.A. Hefny, “Multiple linear regression for determining critical failure factors of agile software projects,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems , Vol. 12, No. 3, 2019, pp. 244–255.
137. P.H. de Souza Bermejo et al., “Agile principles and achievement of success in software development: A quantitative study in Brazilian organizations,” Procedia Technology , Vol. 16, 2014, pp. 718–727.
138. K. Conboy, S. Coyle, X. Wang, and M. Pikkarainen, “People over process: Key challenges in agile development,” IEEE Software , Vol. 28, No. 4, 2011, pp. 48–57.
139. M. Omar et al., “Enhancing agile project success: a comprehensive study of risk management approaches among Malaysian practitioners,” Journal of Software: Evolution and Process , Vol. 36, No. 9, 2024, pp. 1–14.
140. M.L. Drury-Grogan, “Performance on agile teams: Relating iteration objectives and critical decisions to project management success factors,” Information and Software Technology , Vol. 56, No. 5, 2014, pp. 506–515.
141. M. Hamdani and W.H. Butt, “Success and failure factors in agile development,” in International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) . IEEE, 2017, pp. 981–986.
142. A. Henriksen and S.A.R. Pedersen, “A qualitative case study on agile practices and project success in agile software projects,” Journal of Modern Project Management , Vol. 5, No. 1, 2017, pp. 62–73.
143. M. Hummel and A. Epp, “Success factors of agile information systems development: A qualitative study,” in 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences . IEEE, 2015, pp. 5045–5054.
144. F. Kortum et al., “Which information Help agile Teams the Most? An experience Report on the Problems and Needs,” in 46th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 306–313.
145. Y. Lindsjørn, D.I.K. Sjøberg, T. Dingsøyr, G.R. Bergersen, and T. Dybå, “Teamwork quality and project success in software development: A survey of agile development teams,” Journal of Systems and Software , Vol. 122, 2016, pp. 274–286.
146. Y.A. Yousef, “Investigating the role of critical success factors in achieving the success of agile projects in the Gaza Strip,” Journal of computing and information technology , Vol. 30, No. 2, 2022, pp. 117–137.
147. C. Perera and I. Perera, “The impact of client involvement towards agile project success in Sri Lankan software industry,” in Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 279–284.
148. M.N. Riaz, A. Mahboob, and A. Buriro, “Social success factors affecting implementation of Agile software development methodologies in software industry of Pakistan: An empirical study,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications , Vol. 9, No. 7, 2018, pp. 94–98.
149. P. Srivastava and S. Jain, “A leadership framework for distributed self-organized scrum teams,” Team Performance Management , Vol. 23, No. 5-6, 2017, pp. 293–314.
150. M. Kolukuluri and J.B. Singh, “A qualitative study on project failure in agile teams using socio-technical systems theory,” in Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 2023, pp. 6528–6537.
151. M. Kupi and K. McBride, “Agile development for digital government services: challenges and success factors,” in 13th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference . Granada, Spain: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 139–150.
152. J. de Souza Pinto and R. da Silva Leme, “Analysis of project management principles with the Scrum framework in systems development: a case study in a public organization,” Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management , Vol. 21, No. 2, 2024, pp. 1–17.
153. M. Dursun, N. Göker, and H. Mutlu, “Evaluation of project management methodologies success factors using fuzzy cognitive map method: Waterfall, Agile, and Lean Six Sigma Cases,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering , Vol. 10, No. 1, 2022, pp. 35–43.
154. D. Ciric Lalic et al., “How project management approach impact project success? From traditional to agile,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business , Vol. 15, No. 3, 2022, pp. 494–521.
155. R.F. Anjani, T. Raharjo, B. Hardian, and A. Suhanto, “Measuring the relationship between organizational culture and project success: A survey of Agile software development teams,” in 2021 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–9.
156. T.S. Nguyen, S. Mohamed, and S. Mostafa, “Optimising project outcomes in complex environments: empirical insights on agile practices and stakeholder dynamics,” Built Environment Project and Asset Management , Vol. 14, No. 4, 2024, pp. 590–606.
157. R. Wafa et al., “The impact of agile methodology on project success, with a moderating role of Person’s job fit in the IT industry of Pakistan,” Applied Sciences , Vol. 12, No. 21, 2022, pp. 1–16.
158. E.R. Rajan and V.A. Santhosh, “Adoption of agile methodology for improving IT project performance,” Serbian Journal of Management , Vol. 16, No. 2, 2021, pp. 301–320.







