|||"Business Model Flexibility and Software-intensive Companies: Opportunities and Challenges", In e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 185–204, 2021.
DOI: , 10.37190/e-Inf210109.|
Download article (PDF)Get article BibTeX file
Magnus Wilson, Krzysztof Wnuk, Lars Bengtsson
Background: Software plays an essential role in enabling digital transformation via digital services added to traditional products or fully digital business offerings. This calls for a better understanding of the relationships between the dynamic nature of business models and their realization using software engineering practices.
Aim: In this paper, we synthesize the implications of digitalization on business model flexibility for software-intensive companies based on an extensive literature survey and a longitudinal case study at Ericsson AB. We analyze how software-intensive companies can better synchronize business model changes with software development processes and organizations.
Method: We synthesize six propositions based on the literature review and extensive industrial experience with a large software-intensive company working in the telecommunication domain.
Conclusions: Our work is designed to facilitate the cross-disciplinary analysis of business model dynamics and business model flexibility by linking value, transaction, and organizational learning to business model change. We believe that software engineering tools and methods can play a crucial role in enabling more automated synchronization between technology and business model changes.
business flexibility, digital business modeling, equivocality, learning organization
1. P. Parviainen, M. Tihinen, J. Kääriäinen, and S. Teppola, “Tackling the digitalization challenge: how to benefit from digitalization in practice,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management , Vol. 5, No. 1, 2017, pp. 63–77.
2. S. Gupta, L. Ulanova, S. Bhardwaj, P. Dmitriev, P. Raff, and A. Fabijan, “The anatomy of a large-scale experimentation platform,” in International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–109.
3. C. Legner, T. Eymann, T. Hess, C. Matt, T. Böhmann, P. Drews, A. Mädche, N. Urbach, and F. Ahlemann, “Digitalization: Opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community,” Business and Information Systems Engineering , Vol. 59, 2017, pp. 301–308.
4. J. Moore, “The rise of a new corporate form,” Washington Quarterly , Vol. 21, 1998, pp. 167–181.
5. D. Romero and A. Molina, “Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era,” Production Planning and Control: The Management of Operations , Vol. 22, No. 5–6, 2011, pp. 447–472.
6. Y. Snihur and J. Tarzijan, “Managing complexity in a multi-business-model organization,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 51, No. 1, 2017, pp. 50–63.
7. S.A. Cavalcante, “Preparing for business model change: the ‘pre-stage’ finding,” Journal of Management and Governance , Vol. 18, 2014, pp. 449–469.
8. N.F. Höflinger, “The business model concept and its antecedents and consequences – Towards a common understanding,” Academy of Management Proceedings: Organization Development & Change , Vol. 2014:1, 2014.
9. M. Wilson, K. Wnuk, J. Silvander, and T. Gorschek, “A literature review on the effectiveness and efficiency of business modeling,” e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal , Vol. 12, No. 1, 2018, pp. 265–302. [Online]. https://www.e-informatyka.pl/attach/e-Informatica_-_Volume_12/eInformatica2018Art11.pdf
10. M. Wilson and K. Wnuk, “Business modeling and flexibility in software-intensive product development – a systematic literature review,” in Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era . Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 292–304.
11. J. Silvander, M. Wilson, K. Wnuk, and M. Svahnberg, “Supporting continuous changes to business intents,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering , Vol. 27, 2017, pp. 1167–1198.
12. T. Ritter and C. Lettl, “The wider implications of business-model research,” Long Range Planning , 2017, pp. 1–8.
13. C. Zott and R. Amit, “The business model: A theoretically anchored robust construct for strategic analysis,” Strategic Organization , Vol. 11, No. 4, 2013, pp. 403–411.
14. D. Veit, E. Clemons, A. Benlian, P. Buxmann, T. Hess, D. Kundisch, J.M. Leimeister, P. Loos, and M. Spann, “Business models: An information systems research agenda,” Business and Information Systems Engineering , Vol. 6, 2014, pp. 45–53.
15. O.D. Fjeldstad and C.C. Snow, “Business models and organization design,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 51, No. 1, 2018, pp. 32–39.
16. C. Matt, T. Hess, and A. Benlian, “Digital transformation strategies,” Business and Information Systems Engineering , Vol. 57, 2015, pp. 339–343.
17. P.E. Eriksson, P.C. Patel, D.R. Sjödin, J. Frishammar, and V. Parida, “Managing interorganizational innovation projects: Mitigating the negative effects of equivocality through knowledge search strategies,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 49, No. 6, 2016, pp. 691–705.
18. A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur, and C. Tucci, “Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems , Vol. 15, No. 1, 2005, pp. 1–25.
19. P. Ballon, “Business modelling revisited: the configuration of control and value,” Info , Vol. 9, No. 5, 2007, pp. 6–19.
20. H. Meier and M. Boßlau, “Design and engineering of dynamic business models for industrial product-service systems,” in The Philosophers Stone for Sustainability . Springer, 2013, pp. 179–184.
21. A. Richter, T. Sadek, and M. Steven, “Flexibility in industrial product-service systems and use-oriented business models,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology , Vol. 3, No. 2, 2010, pp. 128–134.
22. C. Wohlin, “Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering , 2014, pp. 1–10.
23. C.J. Woodard, N. Ramasubbu, F.T. Tschang, and V. Sambamurthy, “Design capital and design moves: The logic of digital business strategy,” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems , Vol. 37, No. 2, 2013, pp. 537–564.
24. E.K. Chew, “Linking a service innovation-based framework to business model design,” in 16th Conference on Business Informatics , Vol. 1. IEEE, 2014, pp. 191–198.
25. M. Eurich, T. Weiblen, and P. Breitenmoser, “A six-step approach to business model innovation,” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management , Vol. 18, No. 4, 2014, pp. 330–348.
26. K. Mason and S. Mouzas, “Flexible business models,” European Journal of Marketing , Vol. 46, No. 10, 2012, pp. 1340–1367.
27. M. Gul, “Digital business strategies and competitive superiority,” International Journal of Business Ecosystem , Vol. 2, No. 1, Feb. 2020, p. 17–31. [Online]. https://www.bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/106
28. D. Sjödin, V. Parida, M. Jovanovic, and I. Visnjic, “Value creation and value capture alignment in business model innovation: A process view on outcome-based business models,” Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol. 37, No. 2, 2020, pp. 158–183.
29. M. Antikainen, A. Aminoff, and J. Heikkilä, “Business model experimentations in advancing b2b sharing economy research,” in ISPIM Innovation Symposium . The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), 2018, pp. 1–12.
30. M. Trapp, K.I. Voigt, and A. Brem, “Business models for corporate innovation management: Introduction of a business model innovation tool for established firms,” International Journal of Innovation Management , Vol. 22, No. 01, 2018, pp. 18–40.
31. M. Christofi, V. Pereira, D. Vrontis, S. Tarba, and A. Thrassou, “Agility and flexibility in international business research: A comprehensive review and future research directions,” Journal of World Business , Vol. 56, No. 3, 2021, p. 101194. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951621000067
32. D.J. Teece, “Business models and dynamic capabilities,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 51, No. 1, 2018, pp. 40–49. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630117302868
33. L. Linde, J. Frishammar, and V. Parida, “Revenue models for digital servitization: A value capture framework for designing, developing, and scaling digital services,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , Vol. 5, No. 22, 2021, pp. 1–16.
34. F. Hacklin, J. Björkdahl, and M.W. Wallin, “Strategies for business model innovation: How firms reel in migrating value,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 51, No. 1, 2018, pp. 82–110. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024630117302881
35. F. Vendrell-Herrero, G. Parry, M. Opazo-Basáez, and F.J. Sanchez-Montesinos, “Does business model experimentation in dynamic contexts enhance value capture?” International Journal of Business Environment , Vol. 10, No. 1, 2018, pp. 14–34.
36. D. Szopinski, T. Schoormann, T. John, R. Knackstedt, and D. Kundisch, “Software tools for business model innovation: Current state and future challenges,” Electronic Markets , Vol. 30, No. 3, 2020, pp. 469–494.
37. B.W. Wirtz, Adaptation and Modification of Business Models . Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 227–238.
38. H. Gebauer, M. Paiola, N. Saccani, and M. Rapaccini, “Digital servitization: Crossing the perspectives of digitization and servitization,” Industrial Marketing Management , Vol. 93, 2021, pp. 382–388. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850120304855
39. T. Moellers, L. von der Burg, B. Bansemir, M. Pretzl, and O. Gassmann, “System dynamics for corporate business model innovation,” Electronic Markets , Vol. 29, No. 3, 2019, pp. 387–406.
40. C. Nailer and G. Buttriss, “Processes of business model evolution through the mechanism of anticipation and realisation of value,” Industrial Marketing Management , Vol. 91, 2020, pp. 671–685. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850116302735
41. T. Clauss, M. Abebe, C. Tangpong, and M. Hock, “Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 2019, pp. 1–18.
42. N. Schaffer, M. Pfaff, and H. Krcmar, “Dynamic business models: A comprehensive classification of literature,” in Thirteenth Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2019) , 2019.
43. N. Pratama and J. Iijima, “Value operation: Linking value in new business model creation process,” in 23rd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Secure ICT Platform for the 4th Industrial Revolution, PACIS , 2019, pp. 12–32.
44. D.S. Cruzes and T. Dyba, “Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering,” in 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement , 2011, pp. 275–284.
45. P. Runeson and M. Höst, “Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering,” Empirical Software Engineering , Vol. 14, 2009, pp. 131–164.
46. R.K. Yin, Applications of case study research . Sage Publications, 2011.
47. F. Adrodegari and N. Saccani, “A maturity model for the servitization of product-centric companies,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management , 2020.
48. T.C. Lethbridge, S.E. Sim, and J. Singer, “Studying software engineers: Data collection techniques for software field studies,” Empirical software engineering , Vol. 10, No. 3, 2005, pp. 311–341.
49. B. Flyvbjerg, “Five misunderstandings about case-study research,” Qualitative inquiry , Vol. 12, No. 2, 2006, pp. 219–245.
50. W. Reim, V. Parida, and D. Örtqvist, “Strategy, business models or tactics – What is product-service systems (PSS) literature talking about?” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED , 2013, pp. 309–318.
51. W. Reim, V. Parida, and D. Örtqvist, “Product-service systems (PSS) business models and tactics – a systematic literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production , 2014.
52. H. Meier, R. Roy, and G. Seliger, “Industrial Product-Service systems – IPS2,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology , Vol. 59, No. 2, 2010, pp. 607–627.
53. D. Kindström, “Towards a service-based business model – Key aspects for future competitive advantage,” European Management Journal , Vol. 28, No. 6, 2010, pp. 479–490.
54. A. Zolnowski and T. Böhmann, “Business modeling for services: Current state and research perspectives,” in AMCIS 2011 Proceedings , 2011, pp. 1–8.
55. A. Bharadwaj, O.A. El Sawey, P.A. Pavlou, N. Venkatraman, O.a. El Sawy, P.A. Pavlou, and N. Venkatraman, “Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights,” MIS Quarterly , Vol. 37, No. 2, 2013, pp. 471–482.
56. H. Munir, K. Wnuk, and P. Runeson, “Open innovation in software engineering: a systematic mapping study,” Empirical Software Engineering , Vol. 21, No. 2, 2016, pp. 684–723.
57. X. Koufteros, M. Vonderembse, and J. Jayaram, “Internal and external integration for product development: The contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy,” Decision sciences , Vol. 36, No. 1, 2005, pp. 97–133.
58. A. Chang and C.C. Tien, “Quantifying uncertainty and equivocality in engineering projects,” Construction Management and Economics , Vol. 24, 2006, pp. 171–184.
59. B.W. Boehm, “Software risk management: principles and practices,” IEEE Software , Vol. 8, No. 1, 1991, pp. 32–41.
60. M. Svahnberg, T. Gorschek, T.T.L. Nguyen, and M. Nguyen, “Uni-repm: validated and improved,” Requirements Engineering , Vol. 18, No. 1, 2013, pp. 85–103.
61. H. Chesbrough, “Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 43, No. 2–3, 2010, pp. 354–363.
62. R.G. McGrath, “Business models: A discovery driven approach,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 43, No. 2–3, apr 2010, pp. 247–261.
63. R. Kohavi, D. Tang, and Y. Xu, Trustworthy online controlled experiments: A practical guide to a/b testing . Cambridge University Press, 2020.
64. R. Rohrbeck, L. Konnertz, and S. Knab, “Collaborative business modelling for systemic and sustainability innovations,” International Journal of Technology Management , Vol. 63, No. 1/2, 2013, p. 4.
65. OMG, Value Delivery Modeling Language Specification, v1.0 . Object Management Group, OMG.org, 2015, [Online; accessed 2018-08-08] http://www.omg.org/spec/VDML/About-VDML/ .
66. F. Fagerholm, A. Sanchez Guinea, H. Mäenpää, and J. Münch, “The right model for continuous experimentation,” Journal of Systems and Software , Vol. 123, 2017, pp. 292–305.
67. A. Fabijan, P. Dmitriev, H.H. Olsson, and J. Bosch, “The evolution of continuous experimentation in software product development: From data to a data-driven organization at scale,” in 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) , 2017, pp. 770–780.
68. S. Cavalcante, P. Kesting, and J. Ulhøi, “Business model dynamics and innovation:(re)establishing the missing linkages,” Management Decision , Vol. 49, 2011, pp. 1327–1342.
69. R. Casadesus-Masanell and J.E. Ricart, “From Strategy to Business Models and onto Tactics,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 43, No. 2–3, 2010, pp. 195–215.
70. Y.L. Doz and M. Kosonen, “Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal,” Long Range Planning , Vol. 43, No. 2–3, 2010, pp. 370–382.
71. S. Schneider and P.A.T. Spieth, “Business model innovation and strategic flexibility: insights from an experimental research design,” International Journal of Innovation Management , Vol. 18, No. 6, 2014, pp. 1–22.
72. A. Ghezzi, “Revisiting business strategy under discontinuity,” Management Decision , Vol. 51, No. 7, 2013, pp. 1326–1358.
73. A. Osterwalder and Y. Pigneur, Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers . Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010.
74. R. Capilla, J. Bosch, P. Trinidad, A. Ruiz-Cortés, and M. Hinchey, “An overview of dynamic software product line architectures and techniques: Observations from research and industry,” Journal of Systems and Software , Vol. 91, 2014, pp. 3–23.
75. H. Holmström Olsson, J. Bosch, and H. Alahyari, “Towards R&D as innovation experiment systems: A framework for moving beyond agile software development,” in Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering , 2013, pp. 798–805.
76. S. Marciuska, C. Gencel, X. Wang, and P. Abrahamsson, “Feature usage diagram for feature reduction,” in International Conference on Agile Software Development . Springer, 2013, pp. 223–237.
77. K. Wnuk, R.B. Svensson, and D. Callele, “The effect of stakeholder inertia on product line requirements,” in Second IEEE International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Systems, Services, and Systems-of-Systems (RESS) . IEEE, 2012, pp. 34–37.
78. K. Pohl, G. Böckle, and F.J. van Der Linden, Software product line engineering: foundations, principles and techniques . Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.
79. S. Jansen, K.M. Popp, and P. Buxmann, “The sun also sets: Ending the life of a software product,” in Software Business , B. Regnell, I. van de Weerd, and O. De Troyer, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011, pp. 154–167.
80. H.C. Lucas and M. Olson, “The impact of information technology on organizational flexibility,” Journal of Organizational Computing , Vol. 4, 1994, pp. 155–176.
81. J. Barney, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of management , Vol. 17, No. 1, 1991, pp. 99–120.
82. R. Sanchez and J.T. Mahoney, “Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design,” Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 63–76.
83. D.J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 18, 1997, pp. 509–533.
84. K.J.K. Mason and S. Leek, “Learning to Build a Supply Network: An Exploration of Dynamic Business Models,” Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 45, No. 4, 2008, pp. 774–799.
85. D. Namiot and M. Sneps-Sneppe, “On micro-services architecture,” International Journal of Open Information Technologies , Vol. 2, No. 9, 2014, pp. 24–27.
86. J. Bosch, “Achieving simplicity with the three-layer product model,” Computer , Vol. 46, No. 11, Nov. 2013, pp. 34–39. [Online]. doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MC.2013.295
87. J.C. Munson, “Software lives too long,” IEEE Software , Vol. 15, No. 4, Jul. 1998, pp. 18, 20.
88. Y. Jia and M. Harman, “An analysis and survey of the development of mutation testing,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering , Vol. 37, No. 5, 2010, pp. 649–678.
89. D. Romero and F. Vernadat, “Enterprise information systems state of the art: Past, present and future trends,” Computers in Industry , Vol. 79, 2016, pp. 3–13.
90. D. Olausson and C. Berggren, “Managing uncertain, complex product development in high-tech firms: In search of controlled flexibility,” R&D Management , Vol. 15, 2010, p. 383–399.
91. R. Capilla, J. Bosch, and K.C. Kang, Systems and Software Variability Management Concepts, Tools and Experiences . Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013.
92. T. Magnusson and N. Lakemond, “Evolving schemes of interpretation: investigating the dual role of architectures in new product development,” R&D Management , Vol. 47, 2017, pp. 36–46.
93. F. Laloux and K. Wilber, Reinventing Organizations . Laloux, Frederic, 2014. [Online]. http://www.reinventingorganizations.com/pay-what-feels-right.html
94. D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow . Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
95. D.P. Lepak, K.G. Smith, and M.S. Taylor, “Introduction to special topic forum value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective,” Academy of Management Review , Vol. 32, 2007, pp. 180–194.
96. C. Curado, “Organisational learning and organisational design,” The Learning Organization , Vol. 13, No. 1, 2006, pp. 25–48.