e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal Realising the Role of Generative AI Among Project Management Professionals

Realising the Role of Generative AI Among Project Management Professionals

2026
[1]Kari Sainio, Petri Kettunen and Pekka Abrahamsson, "Realising the Role of Generative AI Among Project Management Professionals", In e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 260104, 2026. DOI: 10.37190/e-Inf260104.

Download article (PDF)Get article BibTeX file

Authors

Kari Sainio, Petri Kettunen, Pekka Abrahamsson

Abstract

Context: While conceptual research on AI in project management is advancing, empirical evidence of actual usage among IT project managers practising is limited.
Objective: We investigate how Finnish IT project and programme managers use generative AI in daily work, identifying practices, organisational constraints, and future visions through individual interviews.
Method: Using qualitative descriptive design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 experienced Finnish IT project management consultants who work in multiple client organisations. Data were analysed through hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis to identify usage practices and future usage.
Results: GenAI adoption is fragmented and peripheral, mainly constrained by organisational policies rather than individual resistance. Participants use GenAI mainly for support tasks rather than core project management functions. Despite varied usage, participants converge on envisioning AI as an ‘assistant not replacement,’ reflecting professional boundary work that preserves human authority.
Conclusions: The adoption of GenAI in IT project management is limited by organisational constraints such as security policies and governance structures, which means that organisations should prioritise integration and data protection over bottom-up experimentation. More advanced capabilities remain aspirational, making incremental adoption through low-risk use cases more realistic than broad automation of core project management functions.

Keywords

Generative AI, Project Management, Project Tasks, GenAI Adoption, Project Tools

References

1. V. Holzmann, D. Zitter, and S. Peshkess, “The Expectations of Project Managers from Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study,” Project Management Journal , Vol. 53, No. 5, Oct. 2022, pp. 438–455. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211061779

2. M.I. Hashfi and T. Raharjo, “Exploring the Challenges and Impacts of Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications , Vol. 14, No. 9, 2023, place: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. [Online]. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2883174147/abstract/F859DC41A1CA4252PQ/1

3. G. Dhruva, I. Shettigar, S. Parthasarthy, and V.M. Sapna, “Agile Project Management Using Large Language Models,” in 2024 5th International Conference on Innovative Trends in Information Technology (ICITIIT) , Mar. 2024, pp. 1–6. [Online]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10580873

4. A.M. Felicetti, A. Cimino, A. Mazzoleni, and S. Ammirato, “Artificial intelligence and project management: An empirical investigation on the appropriation of generative Chatbots by project managers,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge , Vol. 9, No. 3, Jul. 2024, p. 100545. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24000842

5. I. Taboada, A. Daneshpajouh, N. Toledo, and T. de Vass, “Artificial Intelligence Enabled Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland) , Vol. 13, No. 8, 2023, number: 8.

6. M. Sandelowski, “Whatever happened to qualitative description?” Research in Nursing & Health , Vol. 23, No. 4, 2000, pp. 334–340, _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/1098-240X%28200008%2923%3A4%3C334%3A%3AAID-NUR9%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G. [Online]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/1098-240X%28200008%2923%3A4%3C334%3A%3AAID-NUR9%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G

7. M. Sandelowski, “What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited,” Research in Nursing & Health , Vol. 33, No. 1, 2010, pp. 77–84, _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nur.20362. [Online]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/nur.20362

8. “Commentary AI – 2023 – Alex Singla – Desktop,” 2023. [Online]. http://ceros.mckinsey.com/commentary-ai-2023-alex-singla-desktop

9. Tabassi Amin Akhavan and Bryde David James, “Challenges For Project Management In The 21st Century,” in ResearchGate , Vol. 2019, 2019. [Online]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330688957 _Challenges _For _Project _Management _In _The _21st _Century

10. T.O.A. Lehtinen, M.V. Mäntylä, J. Vanhanen, J. Itkonen, and C. Lassenius, “Perceived causes of software project failures – An analysis of their relationships,” Information and Software Technology , Vol. 56, No. 6, Jun. 2014, pp. 623–643. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584914000263

11. A. Zeitoun and H. Kerzner, “Project Management Pain Points and a Path Forward,” PM World Journal , Vol. 2021, No. Vol. X, Issue X – October, 2021.

12. “PMBOK® Guide,” 2021. [Online]. https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/pmbok

13. J. Varajão, H. Silva, and M. Pejic-Bach, “Key competences of information systems project managers,” International Journal of Information Technology Project Management , Vol. 10, No. 3, 2019, pp. 73–90.

14. J.K. Das, I. Elegbe, L. Coffie, R. Khadka, L. Chen et al., “AI-Powered IT Project Management: Analyzing the Effectiveness of Advanced Project Management Tools to Ensure Project Efficiency,” in SoutheastCon 2025 , Mar. 2025, pp. 1554–1559, journalAbbreviation: Conf Proc IEEE SOUTHEASTCON. [Online]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10971718/

15. B. Hettrich, N. Krings, and A. Kock, “Bridging the Expertise Gap: The Role of Generative AI in Supporting Project Planning Tasks for Novices and Professionals,” Creativity and Innovation Management , Vol. 34, No. 4, 2025, pp. 789–805.

16. V. Aramali, N. Cho, F. Pande, M.K.S. Al-Mhdawi, U. Ojiako et al., “Generative AI in project management: Impacts on corporate values, employee perceptions, and organizational practices,” Project Leadership and Society , Vol. 6, Dec. 2025, p. 100191. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266672152500016X

17. “What Is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? | IBM,” Aug. 2024. [Online]. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/artificial-intelligence

18. R. Müller, G. Locatelli, V. Holzmann, M. Nilsson, and T. Sagay, “Artificial Intelligence and Project Management: Empirical Overview, State of the Art, and Guidelines for Future Research,” Project Management Journal , Vol. 55, No. 1, Feb. 2024, pp. 9–15. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728231225198

19. “PMI Infinity,” 2024. [Online]. https://infinity.pmi.org/chat

20. “ChatGPT (GPT-4).” [Online]. https://chat.openai.com/?model=gpt-4

21. PMI.org, “Pushing the Limits: Transforming Project Management with Generative AI Innovation,” PMI.org, Tech. Rep., 2024. [Online]. https://www.pmi.org/learning/thought-leadership/transforming-project-management-with-generative-ai

22. H. Dam, T. Tran, J. Grundy, A. Ghose, and Y. Kamei, “Towards effective AI-powered agile project management,” 2019, pp. 41–44.

23. Z. Yu and Y. Gong, “ChatGPT, AI-generated content, and engineering management,” Frontiers of Engineering Management , Vol. 11, No. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 159–166. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-023-0289-6

24. A. Barcaui and A. Monat, “Who is better in project planning?Generative artificial intelligence or project managers?” Project Leadership and Society , Vol. 4, Dec. 2023, p. 100101. [Online]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666721523000224

25. D. Patel, “(PDF) Revolutionizing Project Management with Generative AI,” 2023. [Online]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371313985 _Revolutionizing _Project _Management _with _Generative _AI

26. S. Bushuyev, D. Bushuiev, V. Bushuieva, and O. Ilin, “Managing Digital Transformation Projects under the Influence of AI⋆,” CEUR Workshop Proceedings , Vol. 2025, No. Vol. 4023, 2025, pp. 59–70.

27. J. Gil, J. Martínez Torres, and R. González-Crespo, “The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Project Management Research: A Review,” International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 6, No. 6, 2021, p. 54. [Online]. https://www.ijimai.org/journal/sites/default/files/2021-05/ijimai _6 _6 _6.pdf

28. S. Karnouskos, “The Relevance of Large Language Models for Project Management,” IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society , Vol. 5, Jan. 2024, pp. 758–768, conferenceName: IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society.

29. M. Odeh, “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Project Management,” IEEE Engineering Management Review , Vol. 51, No. 4, 2023, pp. 20–22.

30. L. Greslehner, “Adapting to the Era of GenAI: Evolution of Project Management Practices,” May 2024. [Online]. https://digital.pwc.at/2024/05/13/adapting-to-the-era-of-genai-evolution-of-project-management-practices/

31. U. Flick, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Design . SAGE Publications Ltd, 2022. [Online]. https://methods.sagepub.com/hnbk/edvol/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research-design-srm/toc

32. V. Clarke and V. Braun, “Thematic analysis,” The Journal of Positive Psychology , Vol. 12, No. 3, May 2017, pp. 297–298. [Online]. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

33. L.A. Palinkas, S.M. Horwitz, C.A. Green, J.P. Wisdom, N. Duan et al., “Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research,” Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research , Vol. 42, No. 5, Sep. 2015, pp. 533–544. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

34. J. Fereday and E. Muir-Cochrane, “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods , Vol. 5, No. 1, Mar. 2006, pp. 80–92. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

35. H.F. Hsieh and S.E. Shannon, “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis,” Qualitative Health Research , Vol. 15, No. 9, Nov. 2005, pp. 1277–1288. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

36. “ollama/ollama,” Aug. 2024, originalDate: 2023-06-26T19:39:32Z. [Online]. https://github.com/ollama/ollama

37. “Flowise – Build AI Agents, Visually,” Oct. 2023. [Online]. https://flowiseai.com/

38. “n8n.io – AI workflow automation tool.” [Online]. https://n8n.io/

39. K. Malterud, V.D. Siersma, and A.D. Guassora, “Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power,” Qualitative Health Research , Vol. 26, No. 13, Nov. 2016, pp. 1753–1760. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Design © 2015-2026 by e-Informatyka.pl

Built on WordPress Theme: Mediaphase Lite by ThemeFurnace.