e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal Bridging Participatory Co-Design and Model-Driven Engineering for Community-Based Web-3D Framework Development: Method and Validation

Bridging Participatory Co-Design and Model-Driven Engineering for Community-Based Web-3D Framework Development: Method and Validation

2026
[1]Ratna Wardani, Masduki Zakaria, Tika Novita Sari and Dian Novian, "Bridging Participatory Co-Design and Model-Driven Engineering for Community-Based Web-3D Framework Development: Method and Validation", In e-Informatica Software Engineering Journal, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 260107, 2026. DOI: 10.37190/e-Inf260107.

Download article (PDF)Get article BibTeX file

Authors

Ratna Wardani, Masduki Zakaria, Tika Novita Sari, Dian Novian

Abstract

Context: Sustainable tourism platforms require methodologies balancing stakeholder inclusivity with technical rigor. Existing approaches either emphasize participatory design at the cost of formalization or concentrate on technical precision while neglecting community voices, creating a critical gap in developing Web-3D frameworks that honor local knowledge while maintaining engineering excellence.
Objective: We present a replicable methodology integrating Design Thinking, Software Domain Architecture (SDA), and Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) to bridge participatory engagement with formal software specification, validated through DIVEXPLORE-3D, a Web-3D platform for sustainable marine tourism with 54 stakeholders in Gorontalo, Indonesia.
Method: The methodology comprises five integrated phases: (1) participatory workshops with 54 stakeholders across three SetupFloatingEnvironmentoups (tourists, community members, operators) using empathy mapping; (2) requirements formalization through SDA into four architectural layers; (3) model transformation from PIMs to PSMs via MDE; (4) bidirectional validation through a RTM; and (5) pilot deployment with technical and educational evaluation.
Results: The validation of the methodology resulted in four evidence streams: (1) the four-layer architecture achieved 96% coverage of requirements across 68 specifications; (2) an expert evaluation (n=8) rated the sustainability adequacy of the methodology’s specifications at 4.6/5.0; (3) a pilot deployment confirmed technical feasibility (mean latency 73ms, 97.2% uptime); and (4) educational testing (n=67) showed significant gains in conservation knowledge, with a Cohen’s d of 1.52 (p<0.001). Additionally, community content moderation successfully published 78% of content without requiring expert modification.
Conclusions: This study presents a replicable methodology integrating participatory co-design with formal software engineering. Instead of being opposing paradigms, they are complementary processes when mediated by structured traceability mechanisms. The DIVEXPLORE-3D framework promotes sustainable digital tourism through a modular, community-driven platform balancing ecological conservation, cultural preservation, and technical scalability.

Keywords

Participatory Software Engineering, Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), Co-Design Methodology, Requirement Traceability, Web-3D Framework Development, Sustainable Tourism Platform

References

1. D. Buhalis and A. Amaranggana, “Smart tourism destinations enhancing tourism experience through personalisation of services,” in Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015: Proceedings of the international conference in Lugano, Switzerland, February 3-6, 2015 . Springer, 2014, pp. 377–389.

2. A. Evans, M. Romeo, A. Bahrehmand, J. Agenjo, and J. Blat, “3d graphics on the web: A survey,” Computers & graphics , Vol. 41, 2014, pp. 43–61.

3. K.F. Yuen, J. Chua, K.X. Li, and X. Wang, “Consumer’s adoption of virtual reality technologies for marine conservation: Motivational and technology acceptance perspectives,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change , Vol. 182, 2022, p. 121891.

4. T. Jung, M.C. tom Dieck, H. Lee, and N. Chung, “Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museum,” in Information and communication technologies in tourism 2016: Proceedings of the international conference in Bilbao, Spain, February 2-5, 2016 . Springer, 2016, pp. 621–635.

5. M. Alyahya and G. McLean, “Examining tourism consumers’ attitudes and the role of sensory information in virtual reality experiences of a tourist destination,” Journal of Travel Research , Vol. 61, No. 7, 2022, pp. 1666–1681.

6. M. Nikopoulou, P. Kourouthanassis, G. Chasapi, A. Pateli, and N. Mylonas, “Determinants of digital transformation in the hospitality industry: Technological, organizational, and environmental drivers,” Sustainability , Vol. 15, No. 3, 2023, p. 2736.

7. O. Mtapuri, M.A. Camilleri, and A. Dłużewska, “Advancing community-based tourism approaches for the sustainable development of destinations,” Sustainable development , Vol. 30, No. 3, 2022, pp. 423–432.

8. N. Couldry and U.A. Mejias, “Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject,” Television & new media , Vol. 20, No. 4, 2019, pp. 336–349.

9. A. Tiwana, B. Konsynski, and A. Bush, “Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics (research commentary),” Information Systems Research , Vol. 21, No. 4, 2010, pp. 675–687.

10. S. Ha and S. Kim, “Developing a conceptual framework for digital platform literacy,” Telecommunications Policy , Vol. 48, No. 3, 2024, p. 102682.

11. A. Zeqiri, A. Ben Youssef, and T. Maherzi Zahar, “The role of digital tourism platforms in advancing sustainable development goals in the industry 4.0 era,” Sustainability , Vol. 17, No. 8, 2025, p. 3482.

12. A. Ben Youssef and I. Mejri, “Linking digital technologies to sustainability through industry 5.0: A bibliometric analysis,” Sustainability , Vol. 15, No. 9, 2023, p. 7465.

13. G. Baxter and I. Sommerville, “Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering,” Interacting with computers , Vol. 23, No. 1, 2011, pp. 4–17.

14. R. Manellanga and I. David, “Participatory and collaborative modeling of sustainable systems: A systematic review,” in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th international conference on model driven engineering languages and systems , 2024, pp. 645–654.

15. K. Holtzblatt and H. Beyer, Contextual Design: Evolved . Springer International Publishing, 2015. [Online]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02207-4

16. N. Akhtar, N. Khan, M. Mahroof Khan, S. Ashraf, M.S. Hashmi et al., “Post-covid 19 tourism: will digital tourism replace mass tourism?” Sustainability , Vol. 13, No. 10, 2021, p. 5352.

17. A. Zeqiri, “Virtual tourism as a substitute for physical tourism during covid-19 pandemic,” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies , Vol. 26, No. 2, 2024, pp. 125–144.

18. L. Qiu, X. Li, and S.h. Choi, “Exploring the influence of short video platforms on tourist attitudes and travel intention: A social–technical perspective,” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management , Vol. 31, 2024, p. 100826.

19. F. Manuri, A. Sanna, and F. De Pace, “Storytelling in the metaverse: from desktop to immersive virtual reality storyboarding,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Metrology for eXtended Reality, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Engineering (MetroXRAINE) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 28–33.

20. A.R. Gonçalves, L.L.P. Dorsch, and M. Figueiredo, “Digital tourism: an alternative view on cultural intangible heritage and sustainability in tavira, portugal,” Sustainability , Vol. 14, No. 5, 2022, p. 2912.

21. D. Buhalis, D. Leung, and M. Lin, “Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing,” Tourism management , Vol. 97, 2023, p. 104724.

22. Y.K. Dwivedi, L. Hughes, A.M. Baabdullah, S. Ribeiro-Navarrete, M. Giannakis et al., “Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” International journal of information management , Vol. 66, 2022, p. 102542.

23. D. Buhalis, T. Harwood, V. Bogicevic, G. Viglia, S. Beldona et al., “Technological disruptions in services: lessons from tourism and hospitality,” Journal of service management , Vol. 30, No. 4, 2019, pp. 484–506.

24. D. Buhalis and N. Karatay, “Mixed reality (mr) for generation z in cultural heritage tourism towards metaverse,” in ENTER22 e-Tourism Conference . Springer, 2022, pp. 16–27.

25. H. Go and M. Kang, “Metaverse tourism for sustainable tourism development: Tourism agenda 2030,” Tourism review , Vol. 78, No. 2, 2023, pp. 381–394.

26. P. Balsiger, T. Jammet, N. Cianferoni, and M. Surdez, “Coping with digital market re-organization: How the hotel industry strategically responds to digital platform power,” Competition & Change , Vol. 27, No. 1, 2023, pp. 163–183.

27. D. Gursoy, Y. Li, and H. Song, “Chatgpt and the hospitality and tourism industry: an overview of current trends and future research directions,” Journal of hospitality marketing & management , Vol. 32, No. 5, 2023, pp. 579–592.

28. M. Iranmanesh, M. Ghobakhloo, M. Nilashi, M.L. Tseng, E. Yadegaridehkordi et al., “Applications of disruptive digital technologies in hotel industry: A systematic review,” International Journal of Hospitality Management , Vol. 107, 2022, p. 103304.

29. S. Ratna, S. Saide, A.M. Putri, R.E. Indrajit, and D. Muwardi, “Digital transformation in tourism and hospitality industry: a literature review of blockchain, financial technology, and knowledge management,” EuroMed Journal of Business , Vol. 19, No. 1, 2024, pp. 84–112.

30. Y. Chen, N. Zhang, and X. Cheng, “The spillover effects of online tourism platforms on sustainable development,” Information Systems Journal , Vol. 34, No. 3, 2024, pp. 788–827.

31. E.B.N. Sanders and P.J. Stappers, “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design,” Co-design , Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008, pp. 5–18.

32. K. Dorst, “The core of ‘design thinking’and its application,” Design studies , Vol. 32, No. 6, 2011, pp. 521–532.

33. K. Pohl, Requirements Engineering . Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. [Online]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12578-2

34. R. Busulwa, M. Pickering, and I. Mao, “Digital transformation and hospitality management competencies: Toward an integrative framework,” International Journal of Hospitality Management , Vol. 102, 2022, p. 103132.

35. L. Bass, Software architecture in practice . Pearson Education India, 2012.

36. C. Becker, S. Betz, R. Chitchyan, L. Duboc, S.M. Easterbrook et al., “Requirements: The key to sustainability,” IEEE Software , Vol. 33, No. 1, 2015, pp. 56–65.

37. N. Medvidovic and R.N. Taylor, “Software architecture: foundations, theory, and practice,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering-Volume 2 , 2010, pp. 471–472.

38. D.C. Schmidt et al., “Model-driven engineering,” Computer-IEEE Computer Society- , Vol. 39, No. 2, 2006, p. 25.

39. M. Brambilla, J. Cabot, and M. Wimmer, Model-driven software engineering in practice . Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2017.

40. M. Perelygina, D. Kucukusta, and R. Law, “Digital business model configurations in the travel industry,” Tourism Management , Vol. 88, 2022, p. 104408.

41. T. Bratteteig and I. Wagner, Disentangling participation: power and decision-making in participatory design . Springer, 2014.

42. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative research in psychology , Vol. 3, No. 2, 2006, pp. 77–101.

43. K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M.A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A design science research methodology for information systems research,” Journal of management information systems , Vol. 24, No. 3, 2007, pp. 45–77.

44. G. Goldkuhl, “Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research,” European journal of information systems , Vol. 21, No. 2, 2012, pp. 135–146.

45. M.Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice . Sage publications, 2014.

46. O.C. Gotel and C. Finkelstein, “An analysis of the requirements traceability problem,” in Proceedings of IEEE international conference on requirements engineering . IEEE, 1994, pp. 94–101.

47. J. Cleland-Huang, O.C. Gotel, J. Huffman Hayes, P. Mäder, and A. Zisman, “Software traceability: trends and future directions,” in Future of software engineering proceedings , 2014, pp. 55–69.

48. R. Scheyvens and R. Biddulph, “Inclusive tourism development,” Tourism Geographies , Vol. 20, No. 4, 2018, pp. 589–609.

49. C.C. Venters, C. Jay, L. Lau, M.K. Griffiths, V. Holmes et al., “Software sustainability: The modern tower of babel,” in CEUR Workshop proceedings , Vol. 1216. CEUR, 2014, pp. 7–12.

50. C. Calero and M. Piattini, “Introduction to green in software engineering,” in Green in software engineering . Springer, 2015, pp. 3–27.

51. A.R. Hevner, S.T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, “Design science in information systems research,” Management Information Systems Quarterly , Vol. 28, No. 1, 2008, p. 6.

52. A.B. Youssef, M. Dahmani, and A. Zeqiri, “Do e-skills enhance use of e-services in the hospitality industry? a conditional mixed-process approach.” International Journal of Data & Network Science , Vol. 5, No. 4, 2021.

Design © 2015-2026 by e-Informatyka.pl

Built on WordPress Theme: Mediaphase Lite by ThemeFurnace.